tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-286599265273958850.post2297775029227556222..comments2023-10-31T07:21:09.792-04:00Comments on William L. Anderson: Who Is Holly Kittle? Part IIWilliam L. Andersonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01802990642236807359noreply@blogger.comBlogger40125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-286599265273958850.post-63179603665864056992010-09-13T10:17:51.632-04:002010-09-13T10:17:51.632-04:00What slays me, is as soon as someone uses the same...What slays me, is as soon as someone uses the same terminology about Kittle, they get blasted. <br /><br />I do believe the good old LMJC opened up that can of worms when they referred to the very well-educated, respected & respectful, true EXPERTS as "whores of the court". So if someone uses the words "tramp in bed with", they are automatically saying Kittle is sleeping with someone????? NOT! Open your eyes & read the context of it before you get all testy about your friend.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-286599265273958850.post-26816572079815076522010-09-08T16:02:21.211-04:002010-09-08T16:02:21.211-04:00She was oh so innocent...remember this...
http://...She was oh so innocent...remember this...<br /><br />http://www.allbusiness.com/crime-law-enforcement-corrections/criminal-offenses-sex/14345160-1.htmlAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-286599265273958850.post-5151037451248263392010-09-08T15:51:25.511-04:002010-09-08T15:51:25.511-04:00In many ways, she is probably considered a "t...In many ways, she is probably considered a "tramp for the prosecution". Doing their dirty work, whether it involved being honest or not with her facebook buddies Gregor and Arnt.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-286599265273958850.post-16317708730461782912010-09-08T15:49:30.043-04:002010-09-08T15:49:30.043-04:00You would think she would at leas try to appear ob...You would think she would at leas try to appear objective, instead she is facebook buddies with Arnt and Gregor...awesome. Apparently she is not the brightest bulb. Is that who we really want interviewing children?<br /><br />In fact two characteristics of child molestors are that they are married, and they take photos of victims. Another is that they may work with programs involving children. Does that automatically make Holly Nave Kittle a child molester? Arnt and Gregor might disagree.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-286599265273958850.post-57293905899829087742010-09-08T15:43:16.538-04:002010-09-08T15:43:16.538-04:00"I think the term 'in bed' should hav..."I think the term 'in bed' should have meant in cahoots." I guess it threw me off when the word "Tramp" was used before "in bed." Thanks so much for clarifying. So nice of you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-286599265273958850.post-79850041082375989582010-09-08T15:34:41.228-04:002010-09-08T15:34:41.228-04:00I think the term "in bed" should have me...I think the term "in bed" should have meant in cahoots. BTW...I love this quote...<br />One expert who made an appearance, Holly Nave Kittle of the Children’s Advocacy Center, was openly hostile to questions about her lack of credentials and was unfamiliar with any relevant child abuse literature. Neither did she help her credibility as a witness after she “liked” a public Facebook post by Arnt, in which he wondered “if Tonya Craft’s Defense [sic] lawyers are really insane of [sic] just trying to jack up her defense bill?” (Both Arnt and Kittle’s conduct likely violate Georgia’s ethical rules.)<br /><br />BTW, do you not have some work to do at the CAC framing some people?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-286599265273958850.post-58527939597027352022010-09-08T15:24:59.248-04:002010-09-08T15:24:59.248-04:00OK, Anonymous 3:11, what does that (UNTRUE) statem...OK, Anonymous 3:11, what does that (UNTRUE) statement have to do with anything? And for all of you out there "standing up" for Bill and how you all "know him," well, I know Holly Kittle and she IS NOT "in bed" with anyone other than her HUSBAND. Just as you have proven time and time again, this blog is a joke. How can anyone take it seriously with comments like these?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-286599265273958850.post-58390876775001058062010-09-08T15:11:10.452-04:002010-09-08T15:11:10.452-04:00Holly Kittle - Incompetent Tramp in bed with half ...Holly Kittle - Incompetent Tramp in bed with half of the LMJC. Here is one for the news media to do some research on.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-286599265273958850.post-413269510308388532010-09-08T14:09:03.210-04:002010-09-08T14:09:03.210-04:00To All:
Reading over this blog the last week or s...To All:<br /><br />Reading over this blog the last week or so I have viewed some comments that are worth consideration,some comments that are clearly false, and some comments that are alarmingly nasty. <br /><br />Out of respect to the Kittle Family, I am writing to inform ALL those who are uninformed. Kittle's job is to interview (period). Her job revolves around the protection of children. Children are brought to her office because of claims of molestation, rape, neglect, etc. Kittle (nor anyone else at the Advocacy Center) attempt to seek out "potential" child molesters to prosecute. All of her cases are referrals...which means that if there is belief that a child has been molested, an interview should take place...it's the law. <br /><br />Kittle's interviews with the children are non-threatening and non-judgemental. If a child states that he/she had a sexual encounter, it is not Kittle's job (nor should it be) to call the child a liar or demean the child. Her job is to interview and gain the child's trust...and with this trust, hopefully find the truth. <br /><br />For those of you who know how the system works, it is not Kittle's job or determination on who/when to prosecute. Kittle simply interviews children...and occasionally has to testify (about the interview) in court. <br /><br />As for Kittle's testimony...there is no room for lies because Kittle's requirement on the witness stand is to answer questions related to the interview of the children. I would hate to think that anyone should believe that Kittle could sway a jury (out of spite) by her comments regarding a child's direct recollection of alleged abuse. <br /><br />And finally, to reference those who "claim to know" that someone is or isn't a child molester; anyone who has been molested can tell you that no one really EVER knows what happens behind closed doors, and NO ONE can honestly say with 100% certainty that someone is not a "child molester"...the only ones that know are the molester and unfortunate victims! <br /><br />The only job Kittle has is interview...to listen to the child and document what she finds...not to provide ANY bias, which she has never done!<br /><br />Please think about your comments before you post them...and some may need to think about them again!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-286599265273958850.post-57939127876934401982010-09-07T09:46:30.524-04:002010-09-07T09:46:30.524-04:00What I find interesting of the "trolls" ...What I find interesting of the "trolls" is their lack of knowledge in the fields in which they profess to know. Fortunately, there are a great deal of honest lawyers, LEO's, forensic interviewers & judges who read & comment on Bill's blog. Yes they do it anon, but, they do it. A lot of the good, some great people in these fields are disgusted & quite alarmed at what has been happening in the LMJC. They are amused at the ramblings of the people who are "friends" of questionable people who are framing innocent people in this district. <br /><br />Not once, has one of the "friends" said something worth a grain of salt. I understand protecting friends, but I also believe in truth & justice over friendships & family any day of the week. I have a nearly life-long friend who happens to be the topic of some of Bill's blogs. I will not defend him & in fact, I have told him time & time again, that what he has done is wrong. He has tried to justify it as "his job", but I don't take that for an excuse or an answer. That is what a friend does, they don't sit by & assume that because of a friendship or because they are family that this person is gold or only speaks the truth. If the friendship ends, so be it. it wasn't worth what you thought in the first place. <br /><br />In turn, that is what makes a good person in our judicial system. Someone who overlooks friendships, family, ties to the community or church & searches for truth & justice. Sadly, the LMJC has never done that, & even worse, it has become a mainstay for the innocent to go to jail. I recently had a friend who "slipped the envelope" & everything went away in a dui case. In Tonya's case, it was very different. There were no envelopes to slip, it was "take the plea or you are going to prison". Thank God in Heaven that she fought for her life. I will support Mr. Combs, just as I did Tonya. <br /><br />I know at least one of the people who is protecting Kittle. Regarding this person, I would be scared to death because of my profession. But honestly, this person is connected & will never have to worry about being the next Tonya Craft or James Combs. <br /><br />Bill, keep up the AWESOME work & I do enjoy your blogs. What I enjoy most, are the facts from which you speak & if you are speaking an opinion, you say so. Thank you for keeping our district on its toes. For so many years, so many have wondered, "what can I do?". Well, you gave an outlet & you are giving people a voice. You know as well as I do, there are people on here who have knowledge & conviction & will stand for what you speak. We have your back. You have not committed slander or libel, so you have nothing to worry about. So to the person who obviously knows nothing about the law, dig deeper & find out the true meanings of terms before you throw them out there. Tonya's legal team does & she will reign victorious again. <br /><br />Truth SeekerAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-286599265273958850.post-27814019722893565522010-09-06T12:13:48.535-04:002010-09-06T12:13:48.535-04:00Whoever wrote the "Mr. Slanderson" lette...Whoever wrote the "Mr. Slanderson" letter should thank his/her lucky stars he/she is not in a room full of actual survivors of child sexual abuse. Ditto for Holly Kittle and the prosecution in Tonya Craft's, James Combs' and Brad Wade's cases.<br /><br /> The only thing that inspires as much animus in us as the people who molested us are those who try to impute our suffering to others (worst of all, children) and use it in an attempt to aggrandize themselves or indict those against whom they have grudges of whatever kind. And worst of all are those like Kittle, the otherwise inconsequential people who go along with them.<br /><br />To understand people of her ilk, one should read Alberto Moravia's "The Conformist" and see Bernardo Bertolucci's film based on it.Justine Valinottihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10852069587181432102noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-286599265273958850.post-27679698558496127362010-09-05T10:53:40.027-04:002010-09-05T10:53:40.027-04:00Thank you for your response, kbp. Yes, that makes ...Thank you for your response, kbp. Yes, that makes sense to me... Kittle did come into the Craft case much later. However, it will be interesting to see exactly how she conducts herself during James Combs trial, and what role she played in bringing about charges against him. With Stacy Long no longer working at CAC, then Kittle may be risking more liability for herself in the event Combs eventually pursues civil litigation as well. I would imagine one could only act as an incompetent, ignorant wannabe for only so long without suffering some sort of consequences. She needs to give some serious thought to that before she decides to blindly support the prosecutors in their continued railroad jobs.<br /><br />****************<br /><br />On another note, I must say that I am so hopeful when I continue to see so many trolls visiting this site and commenting. I have noticed that when Bill starts talking about specific people who were involved in the Craft fiasco, like for instance Tim Deal, then suddenly, lo and behold, there appears a troll who starts spouting off his superior knowledge about all things LE only to be proven a fool by another poster who actually discredits most of what the troll says. Haha! I have no doubts whatsoever that the LMJC criminals still read this blog and they, themselves, or their buddies post here trying desperately to defend their actions. <br /><br />There are events and trials that are looming in the very distant future that will keep the spotlight on these people. Tonya Craft's radio program, (including her blog and podcast), the upcoming trials of Eric Echols and James Combs, insure that the focus will remain on them. There are a lot of people dedicated to watching their demise with utter enjoyment. They're scared... no doubt about it, otherwise you wouldn't have seen such a pathetic attempt as distancing themselves as was evidenced by the mass recusal of ALL of the LMJC judges for Eric Echols trial.<br /><br />There is change coming...Kayenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-286599265273958850.post-5442692761932842822010-09-05T09:16:41.128-04:002010-09-05T09:16:41.128-04:00I think that if children are not hurt by any means...I think that if children are not hurt by any means and there is no proof of any damage to them, there shouldn't even be a trial. Kids are seeing and hearing what they can do to get out of trouble and are using this more and more, not realizing how much damage they will do to the person they are accusing. What would they think if it was their family being attacked by a child?mariahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14095239514865936349noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-286599265273958850.post-89058166984764975432010-09-05T07:39:24.608-04:002010-09-05T07:39:24.608-04:00This case is just still very electric, and try as ...This case is just still very electric, and try as they may it's not going away.<br />The LMJC is being duefully being exposed for what it's worth.<br />Kittle is just 1 bad apple hanging off the tree.<br />I think Arnt is the ring leader.<br />When is EE new court date?<br />I am anxious to see what kind of biased court actions they come up with to use against him.Abrahamnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-286599265273958850.post-42976427272014140012010-09-04T23:43:12.269-04:002010-09-04T23:43:12.269-04:00Kaye,
Kittle is just a corrupt team player who is...Kaye,<br /><br />Kittle is just a corrupt team player who is very unprofessional. <br /><br />Tonya would have to try seeking damages for intentional ignorance on Kittle's part. Holly acted more like a biased stenographer for the prosecution than a forensic interviewer. <br /><br />There is a fine line on what can be done with testimony, as it in itself cannot be the basis for liability. It’s more like evidence that supports the claim of liability created prior to giving the testimony.<br /><br />Kittle just going along with the late interview, purposefully ignoring what an interviewer should have done, is a difficult situation. Her limited involvement so late in the case (long after charges had been filed) would make it difficult to prove she was a co-conspirator, even though I believe she showed disregard for what she should have done.kbphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11814695387546108048noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-286599265273958850.post-798255924001148332010-09-04T23:13:00.848-04:002010-09-04T23:13:00.848-04:00To the person who called Mr. Anderson Mr. Slanders...To the person who called Mr. Anderson Mr. Slanderson, you need to look up words before you use them. Slander means, a malicious, false, and defamatory statement or report: a slander against his good name. You dummy, there's no slander here,just unbelievable facts that I and 100's of others never want to let die! Keep up the good work Mr Anderson. People are still watching.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-286599265273958850.post-70991550372500347562010-09-04T19:41:22.754-04:002010-09-04T19:41:22.754-04:00If I recall correctly, Holly Kittle wasn't nam...If I recall correctly, Holly Kittle wasn't named in Tonya Craft's federal lawsuit. I wonder why not?Kayenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-286599265273958850.post-4989417260078294622010-09-04T19:37:34.533-04:002010-09-04T19:37:34.533-04:00Slanderson? Perhaps, the poster meant Libelson as ...Slanderson? Perhaps, the poster meant Libelson as the words were written rather than spoken. <br /><br />If Professor Anderson is using court documents on which to base his writing, and if all of his writing is of his opinion, then, while I am not an attorney though I do work in the field, I daresay that libel may not be at issue here.<br /><br />Reader from NYCAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-286599265273958850.post-437957823336096002010-09-04T13:35:21.065-04:002010-09-04T13:35:21.065-04:00Amen. Mr Anderson. Keep it coming.Amen. Mr Anderson. Keep it coming.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-286599265273958850.post-47669335834068428622010-09-04T08:05:20.657-04:002010-09-04T08:05:20.657-04:00Holly is married. Laurie Evans was Van Pelt's ...Holly is married. Laurie Evans was Van Pelt's girlfriend. That is why he recused himself from the case, although from what I have heard, he was telling people before the trial that Tonya was a "sociopath," which was why, in his view, she passed the lie detector tests.<br /><br />You see, in the LMJC, they go by "Heads I win, tails you lose" justice. It works, as long as you have the right connections or you are like Sandra Lamb and can commit crimes in broad daylight (and file false reports) and Van Pelt and his friends protect you.William L. Andersonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01802990642236807359noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-286599265273958850.post-53051699921361435552010-09-04T06:43:32.586-04:002010-09-04T06:43:32.586-04:00I thought Van Pelt dated Laurie Evans?I thought Van Pelt dated Laurie Evans?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-286599265273958850.post-27243941315904602362010-09-04T05:58:24.832-04:002010-09-04T05:58:24.832-04:00Unless I missed it, I can't believe that no on...Unless I missed it, I can't believe that no one has done the LMJCm destructive... errrr... deductive reasoning bit... So Let's<br /><br />Holly Kittle photgraphs naked babies.<br /><br />Pictures of naked babies constitute child pornography, (which is a heinous crime)<br /><br />People with possession of Child Pornography are pedophiles and child molesters.<br /><br />Holly Kittle is a child molester.<br /><br />and then <br /><br />Ralph Van Pelt dates Holly Kittle.<br /><br />Holly Kittle has just previously been proven using the accepted practices of the LMJC by this court of opinion to be a child molester and pedophile.<br /><br />Ralph Van Pelt approves of those pictures, and surely looks at those pictures taken by Holly Kittle due to close proximity of their relationship status.<br /><br />Viewing child pornography is a state and federal crime, and is done by child molesters and pedophiles. <br /><br />therefore we conclude that Ralph Van Pelt is a Child Molester.<br /><br />Hey Holly, Do you see how absurd your and LMJC felon check off lists are?<br /><br />and Holy Holly just rolls her eyes, giggles and says "So What?"Len Gregorisadouchenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-286599265273958850.post-7730289622000639742010-09-04T04:31:41.248-04:002010-09-04T04:31:41.248-04:00Two points:
First, has anyone here seen the story...Two points:<br /><br />First, has anyone here seen the story today that a bunch of people in Portugal, including several former high-ranking government officials, have been convicted on what seems to be Tonya Craft-esque evidence? The trial took 6 years, and the judges deliberated and found them guilty in a matter of days, then the same day sentenced them all. I'll have to say, as totally screwy, devilishly-twisted as the State of Georgia's court system is, I'd rather be tried there than in Portugal.<br /><br />Second, if Miss Kitty has a problem with what you're saying, as per my comment a few days past, let her challenge Dr. Anderson to a duel. All of you, if you're disturbed by what someone writes about you, don't go and write nasty words on some blog or call in annonymously to some radio talk show, send the person a note giving them two options: pistols or swords. There must be some place in the world where dueling is still legal. Save yourselves a whole lot of time and grief, and even possibly money, buy a (one way) ticket, and either skewer or be skewered/pump led or eat led. It really would save so much trouble if people knew that by saying or doing something like what those people did to Tonya Craft they face the distinct possibility of hearing the words, "Gentlemen, when you are ready."Lamenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-286599265273958850.post-74419912439386259752010-09-03T23:05:05.669-04:002010-09-03T23:05:05.669-04:00What goes around comes around. Holly Kittle will b...What goes around comes around. Holly Kittle will be judged by God for every lie she told in that court, and she will answer as to why she did it. We will all know the motive. She and the whole bunch can go to church every time the doors are opened but it won't get them into heaven. God hates lying and isn't going to change His mind about it. The Bible says there is no place for liars in heaven, so you'd better watch out bringing God into this as a coverup. God knows every lie the whole bunch told and they will indeed answer to Him. It will all come out someday. They need to repent of it, and ask forgiveness first from God and then from Tonya. If they truly are Christians, the Holy Spirit lets them know their guilt. If they aren't Christians, it is only by God's mercy that they will see the need for repentance, and turn to Him. You just can't fool God, folks!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-286599265273958850.post-41855058578055839632010-09-03T22:15:51.298-04:002010-09-03T22:15:51.298-04:00I was in the courtroom and saw Holly roll her eyes...I was in the courtroom and saw Holly roll her eyes, act very nonchalant, and even laugh on occasion. Tonya's attorney even asked Holly if something was funny. Holly exuded disrespect to all but especially to the children involved in these false allegations. If she believed the allegations Holly would not be on the stand grinning, laughing, and shrugging her shoulders. If she did believe the allegations and acted so unprofessionally that concerns me even more. Holly knew it was bogus but she thought it was "in the bag". All of their arrogant attitudes are offensive and one day they will have to answer to someone far bigger than any of us!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com