Joal Henke provides more perjured testimony, which is important, because the prosecution must keep its perfect record of having all its witnesses lying:
Dad answers to inconsistencies in his statement, "I don't have a lot of experience with this"
Dad says he didn't include in statement that daughter was allegedly molested because authorities had not interviewed daughter yet.
Dad testifies what is in statement he gave is not true. Says it may be a typo.
Dad in statement says he was called by parents of "several" small girls about alleged abuse. Says today just parents of one girl.
Well, there you have it. This guy wouldn't be giving false testimony. No, it's gotta be a typo. I think this speaks for itself.
Begin Original Post
In case readers still might have doubts about the impartiality of Judge Brian House, well, you can put them away. Today's testimony involving Joal Henke, Tonya Craft's ex-husband, has created a new low in a case that already has been in the muck for a long, long time.
I won't put everything from the media links, but nonetheless, I will put down a few things and then elaborate:
Update 9:38amIt is difficult to know where to begin with this testimony, but what House is doing is reprehensible, absolutely reprehensible. Joal Henke's allegations WERE NOT IN THE DISCOVERY MATERIAL, but suddenly emerged deus ex machina in testimony and House permits it as though it were judicially proper.
State calls dad of one of the alleged victims then court takes a ten minute break.
State is citing case law about whether bi-sexuality is relevant.
Judge will allow bi-sexual argument to be made. He denied defense's request for a hearing about issue.
Defense argues Tonya Craft's sexual preference does not relate to alleged child molestation. Citing case law.
Witness testifies Tonya Craft told him she was drugged and ended up in another woman's bed.
Witness testifies he has knowledge that Tonya Craft watched girl on girl sex tape years ago. (What the ancients once called heresay)
Witness says he asked his daughter if "anyone touched her" at first, not directly if Tonya Craft touched her.
Witness says father of another alleged victim called him to tell him about allegations.
State now asking questions about allegations against Tonya Craft.
Witness says didn't mention Tonya Craft being with woman or watching porn when he gave original statement. Says he remembered during trial.
This no longer is a trial, if it ever was. It is a smear campaign, and what House is doing is permitting Ms. Craft to be smeared on the stand in an attempt to inflame the jury.
As I have said before, however, there is a strategy behind this. House already knows that if there is a guilty verdict, deforestation of North America will be necessary to write all of the copy that will be filled with grounds for appeal. However, what House, Chris "Facebook" Arnt, and Len "The Man" Gregor are wanting is a short-term victory. They will have succeeded into railroading Tonya Craft into prison, destroying lives, and then they will claim that when the verdict is overturned, "liberal judges" are "putting child molesters on the streets."